Suzuki SV650 Riders Forum banner

1 - 20 of 38 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,174 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
What the crap is this? I really can't tell who's the bigger monster anymore: child pornographers, or politicians using them as a bogeyman to kill the Internet.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/02/11/feinstein_stimulus_amendment/?ref=most

US lawmaker injects ISP throttle into Obama rescue package

'Network management' meets child porn

By Cade Metz in San Francisco

Posted in Government, 11th February 2009 00:43 GMT

Free research: Application platforms, the state of play

US Senator Dianne Feinstein hopes to update President Barack Obama's $838bn economic stimulus package so that American ISPs can deter child pornography, copyright infringement, and other unlawful activity by way of "reasonable network management."

Clearly, a lobbyist whispering in Feinstein's ear has taken Comcast's now famous euphemism even further into the realm of nonsense.

According to Public Knowledge, Feinstein's network management amendment did not find a home in the stimulus bill that landed on the Senate floor. But lobbyists speaking with the Washington DC-based internet watchdog said that California's senior Senator is now hoping to insert this language via conference committee - a House-Senate pow-wow were bill disputes are resolved.

"This is the most backdoor of all the backdoor ways of doing things," Public Knowledge's Art Brodsky told The Reg. "Conference committees are notorious for being the most opaque of all legislative processes."

Obama's stimulus bill sets aside between $6bn and $9bn for expanding American broadband into rural areas, and Senator Feinstein hopes to (PDF) augment this Broadband Technology Opportunities Program so that it "allows for reasonable network management practices such as deterring unlawful activity, including child pornography and copyright infringement."

On one level, Obama's bill is an effort to boost the American economy. On another, it's an opportunity for lobbyists to make a mockery American government.

According to Public Knowledge, the Motion Picture Association of America is behind Feinstein's language. The MPAA doesn't like copyright infringement. And you can bet the child pornography bit was tossed in for added effect.

But the "network management" bit sounds like ISP speak.

As Art Brodsky and his colleagues pointed out, network management is used to manage networks - not filter content. Content filters are used to filter content. But American ISPs - particularly cable ISPs - will take any excuse they can find to throttle certain traffic.

And if they're using copyright infringement and child porn as excuses, they'll have to start sniffing packets. So, Feinstein's amendment would also destroy net privacy - if there's any out there.

Word from Public Knowledge is that Congressman Henry Waxman will back Feinstein's amendment when it turns up in conference committee. Representing a district near Hollywood, Waxman has long backed the MPAA and the Recording Ass. of America in their efforts to crack down on P2P file sharing. ®
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,779 Posts
Ah yes, Comrade Sen. Dianne Feinstein... :rolleyes:

Don't get me started! :mad:







;D
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,779 Posts
Go to www.house.gov and www.senate.gov to get your Congressman and Senators contact info and web sites. Most have web-based forms that enable you to send e-mail messages to them.

Better hurry, the House is expected to vote on the compromise version of the stimulus bill on Friday, with the Senate set to vote on it Friday evening or Saturday.
 

·
King of D'bags
Joined
·
3,579 Posts
"Reasonable network management"? Sounds like privacy invasion to me.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
2,973 Posts
I don't think you understand the seriousness of this, John. I mean... the government can spy on you now! They NEVER used to be able to do that!
We also didn't have the technology to do so back in the day as we do today.
 

·
45% Member
Joined
·
7,585 Posts
They're injecting what into who's package?? :(

Sounds painful.
 

·
OberKommandant
Joined
·
6,127 Posts
Oh, I understand. I just don't care. I mean, I don't have anything to hide. If you also didn't have anything to hide, you wouldn't have to worry aboot them spying.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
10,443 Posts
is that why youporn was so slow yesterday?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
683 Posts
liutas said:
if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to worry aboot
every time I hear that I want to punch a phucking baby in the face. It's not about whether you have anything to hide. It's about limits on federal powers and a presumption of innocence in the face of lack of evidence.

I have nothing to hide. But I also don't think my government has the right to pass laws which fly in the face of the BoR.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
683 Posts
lol.

I blame government in general. Sure I dislike Obama moreso than I did Bush but that isn't the point. Government as a whole is like a monkey phucking a chicken that's phucking a poodle that's phucking a football.

[insert dachsundhump.jpg]
 
1 - 20 of 38 Posts
Top