Suzuki SV650 Riders Forum banner

Can you jump start the bike through the battery tender connector?

618 Views 35 Replies 11 Participants Last post by  Maddevill
There is a SAE connector hanging off the battery in the 2023 model (and maybe others as well).

Is this connector safe to jump start a bike through? Or is it meant exclusively for charging the battery?
21 - 36 of 36 Posts
So instead of diodes in the R/R frying perhaps it is the mosfet or whatever electrical device that does the shunting that gets fried because the alternator will see it as a short and drive it to failure.
hmmm - if this was true, my bike would be all fried up by now. I am forced to conclude that there is some error in the above statement.
The car charging system will try and charge the MC Battery as if it were a Heavy Duty Battery. How detrimental this might be I cannot attest to as I can't ever remember risking using a running car to start a Motorcycle.
The only "lever" that the car charging system has in charging anything is the voltage it offers up. The drawn current depends on the charged device (based on its effective resistance). The car does not (cannot) push a higher current into something just because it is capable of supplying a higher current level.

Now, the MC will draw whatever current it needs to draw from either source - the car alternator or the car battery. It will not draw more current from the alternator than the battery. Well, maybe a little more, because the alternator voltage may be a bit higher at 14.5V. The MC electrical system is already designed to work with wider voltage range than the nominal range of 12-14.5V.

As usual, this is my understanding. I can be corrected.
Why does this come to mind?

All I hear is,
Burn! :LOL:

  • Like
Reactions: 1
hmmm - if this was true, my bike would be all fried up by now.
Yes, if you are running a PMG/RR and a variable output alternator in parallel across the battery which is the context of my comment. Sorry if you don't or can't understand.
Sorry if you don't or can't understand.
Seems to me, you try to snow people by trying to use technical sounding jargon.

I understand you quite well.
Seems to me, you try to snow people by trying to use technical sounding jargon. I understand you quite well.
I understand you too and while anti-intellectualism is totally understandable, what with fake experts that lie to us with impunity today, I am afraid you are barking up the wrong tree. Please don't throw the baby out with the bath water.
Well, folks - it seems like the "jumping from a running car will fry your bike" may in fact be an old wives tale (at least in this day and age). There is electrically no difference in the voltage put out by the car battery or the alternator of a running car (12-14.5V), such that the current drawn by the bike pretty much depends on the bike itself, and it will draw the same current from either source. In theory, the car battery can supply higher currents than the alternator.

I have always had the car running every time I've jumped another car or a motorcycle. Full disclosure, I am an Electronics engineer and from what little I remember about electricity, this thing never made sense to me. In fact, I thought it was a good idea to have the car running, so you don't impact its battery negatively.

Ok - fight me.

EDIT: Here's a thread on Reddit that makes sense to me. We can do more legitimate research here.
The way I've understood the biggest issue with jumping anything with a running engine is what can happen if you get the leads crossed up. Key off you get a big spark which should inspire you to quickly remove that last lead you just connected in a hurry...and if you're quick it might not do any damage. If the engine is running when you do this you now expose the entire electrical system to this reversed polarity and for SURE there's lots of solid-state things that just won't tolerate this kind of thing. This of course might be wrong...but I think it's logical and might actually be what happened to cause the 'warning' to be promoted in the first place.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I think it's logical and might actually be what happened to cause the 'warning' to be promoted in the first place.
Makes sense.
The key problem as I see it is that the R/R in a moto is typically a shunt type, i.e. shorts the stator to ground to control voltage. So instead of diodes in the R/R frying perhaps it is the mosfet or whatever electrical device that does the shunting that gets fried because the alternator will see it as a short and drive it to failure.
That is a good point dmfdmf. You zeroed right in on the weak spot. Shunt power has the potential to be a problem though might not actually be an issue.

Referring to the SV650 charging diagram above, the electrical parts that would be stressed would be the SCRs and the Stator coils. The rectifying diodes and the Control IC would not be affected.

Suppose the running car puts out, say, 14.5v, but the SV650 regulator SCRs are programmed to shunt at 14.0v. Seeing 14.5v would trigger the SCRs to continuously short the stator during the entire time the car is connected.

Damage to the SCRs and stator would depend on 1) Shunt duration, 2) How much power the stator is producing while shunted 3) How much margin is in the SV650 R/R SCR and stator design.

-Presumably, the duration would be short. Connect the jumper cables, start the bike, remove the jumpers.

-Stator power output would be low at cranking and idle rpm. The only time the stator would generate significant power is if the SV engine were held revved.

-How much design margin is in the SV650 R/R and stator might be inferred by SV650 race bikes. Race bikes run without lights, minimal electrical load, so the SCRs would be shunting a good amount of time. Additionally, the rpm of race bikes often pushes redline, so stator power output would be near max. Some of these SV bikes do 24hr endurance racing without blowing up the stator or R/R, so it seems there is a fair amount of margin for long-duration shunting at high Stator power.

Conclusion, the SCRs and Stator are not likely to be damaged.

As for other motorcycle electrics being damaged, given the motorcycle and car have the same voltage specs, why would the motorcycle be damaged and not the car?

Just because a car battery has massive current capacity relative to a motorcycle is immaterial. As Ziff said, given the same 12v charging systems, the bike will only draw the current needed. A 20A wall outlet can power a 10A hairdryer but will not blow up a mA nightlight. For a given voltage, the load defines the current. Ohm's law.

This topic is a fun intellectual discussion but basically moot. Even if jump-starting a motorcycle from a running car has zero chance of causing damage (likely true, no damage), a car battery has sufficient power to crank a motorcycle starter without the car running. No need to start the car.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 4
@TeeRiver

Now, that was awesome. May I ask what you do for a living?

Suppose the running car puts out, say, 14.5v, but the SV650 regulator SCRs are programmed to shunt at 14.0v. Seeing 14.5v would cause the SCRs to continuously short the stator during the entire time the car is connected.

Damage to the SCRs and stator ...
This part I don't quite get. I am assuming that the shunt mechanism is a protection mechanism. I can only guess that it is in place to detect that the battery is already at max voltage (fully charged), so it stops overcharging it. But if it is a protection mechanism, then it should not result in a catastrophic short (as suggested by @dmfdmf).

EDIT: Looked this up a bit. Seems like the shunting method is a somewhat dated method of limiting the output voltage of the generator to a level that will not fry the vehicle electronics or overcharge the battery. Excess energy is simply dumped to ground as the shunting diodes close over a certain voltage. A couple of things:
  1. The shunting happens as a matter of course ALL the time - as the generator routinely creates excess voltage (depending on the RPM).
  2. Since the car and MC voltages are very similar, no excessive shunting will happen because of the jump start.
  3. I have to now agree with @TeeRiver that it was pretty cool of @dmfdmf to think about this issue in the context of a jump start.
Just because a car battery has massive current capacity relative to a motorcycle is immaterial. As Ziff said, given the same 12v charging systems, the bike will only draw the current needed. For a given voltage, the load defines the current. Ohm's law.
Oh, good. Finally, a definitive confirmation. We should sticky this on the internet :)

This topic is a fun intellectual discussion but basically moot. Even if jump-starting a motorcycle from a running car has zero chance of causing damage (likely true, no damage), a car battery has sufficient power to crank a motorcycle starter without the car running. No need to start the car.
Noted. Thanks!
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 1
The only "lever" that the car charging system has in charging anything is the voltage it offers up. The drawn current depends on the charged device (based on its effective resistance). The car does not (cannot) push a higher current into something just because it is capable of supplying a higher current level.

Now, the MC will draw whatever current it needs to draw from either source - the car alternator or the car battery. It will not draw more current from the alternator than the battery. Well, maybe a little more, because the alternator voltage may be a bit higher at 14.5V. The MC electrical system is already designed to work with wider voltage range than the nominal range of 12-14.5V.

As usual, this is my understanding. I can be corrected.
When my R/R went is only had to hit 16v for a short period for it to ruin the Battery. MC Batteries are not robust.

The MC battery I'm using came with specs/warning to only us a maximum charging rate of 10% of the Amp rating of the battery and in this case 0.9 amps ( 900 mA).

HTH :)
This topic is a fun intellectual discussion but basically moot. Even if jump-starting a motorcycle from a running car has zero chance of causing damage (likely true, no damage), a car battery has sufficient power to crank a motorcycle starter without the car running. No need to start the car.
Totally agree especially with your first point, that was fun.

I have to wonder if at some point, like way back in the 50's or 60's, motorcycle and car charging systems were so different (and more primitive) than today that it was true - jumping a bike with a running car would fry something - and that is where the story began. I vaguely recall as a kid that some really old cars had mechanical voltage regulators and since the technology changed the problem went away.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
...EDIT: Looked this up a bit. Seems like the shunting method is a somewhat dated method of limiting the output voltage of the generator to a level that will not fry the vehicle electronics or overcharge the battery. Excess energy is simply dumped to ground as the shunting diodes close over a certain voltage. A couple of things:
  1. The shunting happens as a matter of course ALL the time - as the generator routinely creates excess voltage (depending on the RPM).
  2. Since the car and MC voltages are very similar, no excessive shunting will happen because of the jump start.
  3. I have to now agree with @TeeRiver that it was pretty cool of @dmfdmf to think about this issue in the context of a jump start
1. Right, shunting is by design however it only happens when the stator puts out enough power to exceed regulation voltage (typ 14.5v). For example, at idle, battery voltage may drop to 14v or lower. Whenever the regulator sees less than 14.5v, the SCRs will be turned off, zero shunting.

2. No. Excess shunting (continuous, which is the potential problem) will happen if the car's charging system puts out, say, 15v when the motorcycle regulator is set to 14.5v. If that happens, the MC regulator will try to regulate down to 14.5v by shunting 100% continuous, which might generate enough heat to do damage. If the car is not running, then the car voltage will be 12.8v max, not enough to tell the MC regulator to shunt.

3. Yes, that was keen insight on dmfdmf's part. (y)


... I have to wonder if at some point, like way back in the 50's or 60's, motorcycle and car charging systems were so different (and more primitive) than today that it was true - jumping a bike with a running car would fry something - and that is where the story began. I vaguely recall as a kid that some really old cars had mechanical voltage regulators and since the technology changed the problem went away.
I think I read something about that. A situation where a running car's alternator puts out large current to the vehicle being jumped. When the cables are suddenly removed, the regulator is unable to react fast enough (mechanical regulator, or the alternator's magnetic field does not collapse fast enough), resulting in a current surge which causes a voltage spike. But in this situation, the spike would happen to the donor car, not the receiving motorcycle/vehicle.

One reason you would want to have the donor car running is to generate high enough voltage to actually charge the receiving vehicle's battery. If the donor car is not running, max battery voltage is only 12.8v, barely enough to provide a charge. Years ago, growing up in NJ, cold winters and ancient battery technology had me jumpstarting my car or giving a jump to someone in need, all the time. Sometimes a successful jump required connecting the cars together for 15min with the donor car's engine at 2k rpm to generate enough charging current. Ah, the good ole days!

My hunch on how the story got started is 1) What you said, 2) A vehicle that needs a jump probably has a problem in the first place. After doing the jump, yup, the problem is still there. :) 3) It is easy to accidentally connect cables reverse-polarity and do all kinds of damage.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 3
No. Excess shunting (continuous, which is the potential problem) will happen if the car's charging system puts out, say, 15v when the motorcycle regulator is set to 14.5v. If that happens, the MC regulator will try to regulate down to 14.5v by shunting 100% continuous, which might generate enough heat to do damage.
Was thinking that myself. The crucial difference between normal operation and trying to regulate a steady voltage offset is that the former is transient. If the latter persists for an extended period, even a small offset could be detrimental.

The insight here (I think) is that the voltage used to jump start a vehicle equipped with a shunt type rectifier regulator, better be less than the target value for that regulator. Otherwise, the RR ends up trying to regulate the applied voltage by shunting it to ground. Since the donor battery voltage is guaranteed to be less than this value (in current systems), it is safer to use that for the jump start.

It is ironic that the danger comes not from the donor's electrical system (with its giant current capacity and what not), but from the receiver's own electrical system.

I think I learned something.
... The insight here (I think) is that the voltage used to jump start a vehicle equipped with a shunt type rectifier regulator, better be less than the target value for that regulator. Otherwise, the RR ends up trying to regulate the applied voltage by shunting it to ground. Since the donor battery voltage is guaranteed to be less than this value (in current systems), it is safer to use that for the jump start.
Right, that is the mechanism but probably not a problem in real life. (y)
I was under the impression that you have to have some voltage in the battery to jump start a fuel injected bike to run the ECU and fuel pump and injectors.

Mad
21 - 36 of 36 Posts
Top